"True mastery can be gained by letting things go their own way. It can't be gained by interfering." Lao-tzu (604BC - 531BC)
Ben has lost his "Zen" and his "Tao," assuming he had them to begin with...
As I had previously commented in my Ben or Zen post, the new Fed chief could have gone a long way in shaking out the excesses of the markets and throwing an authoritative hand in the face of investors with a 25bp rate cut (or zero) rather than extending the hand to bail them out with a 50bp rate cut...
Note: For new TFP readers, "Tao" means "the way" or "path" and is the foundation of Taoism -- an ancient form of eastern philosophy. The famous "yin and yang" is a common symbol of Taoism.
Knowing, now more than ever, that federal entities do not employ the ideas of logic and balance in their thought processes I had at least hoped that Ben and the Fed would strike a "balance" and cut rates by 25bp and resist the accommodative path...
The financial markets and its participants may lose their "way" but "the path" of the prudent investor continues on its course by achieving its own balance...
TFPAuthor, Kent N. Thune, is the President and founder of Atlantic Capital Investments, LLC (ACI), a 'fee-only' Registered Investment Advisory firm located in Mount Pleasant, SC.
The market's euphoric response, of which I am no part of (again!), goes some way in supporting the notion of a Bernanke put, at the very least for the banking sector, but I am starting to develop the notion that this may be no bad thing, and perhaps the banking sector should trade at a constant premium because of it.
Given the location of the problem being addressed (i.e. the heart of the banking system), and the potential ramifications for the rest of the economy, I reluctantly imagine myself doing the same in Bernanke's shoes.
Posted by: Caravaggio | September 18, 2007 at 08:55 PM
I try to resist judging Ben. After all, I must assume that he is performing the best way he knows how. Alan Greenspan also reminds us that "what he did" as Fed chairman was not necessarily "who he was" as a person. In the end, it's a government job with restraints. If Ben were a blogger and someone else were Fed chair, I wonder what he would say?
I wish Ben the best but I was hoping he would make a more courageous move...
Posted by: The Financial Philosopher | September 18, 2007 at 09:13 PM
I am really disheartened at the path chosen by our leadership, our system and our society. Bailing out those who take excessive risks is a great way to punish reasonable action. We are plotting a course of destruction.
Posted by: Kemp | September 18, 2007 at 10:59 PM
Kemp:
Generally, I am disappointed as well; however, it is largely from a philisophical view. Since this was Ben's first test, I was hoping he would not yield to the cries from those market participants that gave in to greed. I was hoping to find in Ben a leader -- not a follower. After all, he will play a significant role in financial markets for years to come...
At least the prudent investor has already chosen their "path," which is largely unaffected by short-term influences. Excess is dangerous. Moderation is wise. Balance is "the way."
Posted by: The Financial Philosopher | September 19, 2007 at 09:54 AM
I'm a Humanities major and this is what we spoke about last week regarding the fall of Roman Empire (not exactly interest rates, but you know what I mean). It's all very interesting. I hope we can all move forward.
Posted by: Ana | September 19, 2007 at 03:11 PM
Every fiat currency in the history of the world has failed. What makes us so full of hubris to think we're so different? Our society is currently in the process of failing. It is more obvious every day.
Posted by: Kemp | September 20, 2007 at 05:14 PM